Quick check of hands, how many of you have heard of the above NSSE? If not, it is time to get acquainted with it. We have previously talked about rankings in this blog and I promised we would return to the subject. The NSSE is not so much a ranking system as it is a measure of how colleges and universities are engaging their students along five different dimensions:
1) Level of academic challenge
2) Active and collaborative learning
3) Student-faculty interaction
4) Enriching educational experiences
5) Supportive campus environment
Students are surveyed (PDF document) about their experience along these different dimensions. From reading the survey, it is obvious that NSSE takes a thorough look at student engagement. Unlike other surveys, NSSE does not give numerical ranks to each of the colleges that participate. Instead, what you will find in their report is how institutions are doing on average based on their Carnegie category (Doctoral, Master's, and Baccalaureate). If you are considering attending an institution like the University of California, then you would be interested in NSSE data on Doctoral (Very High research activity) whereas if you were looking at a California State University, you would want to look at Master's data for the size of the University (Large, Medium, or Small). You can download the 2006 report here.
This data, like the Princeton Review's system we examined earlier, is qualitative in nature. However NSSE data is collected and analyzed through statistical research and interpretation methods. NSSE does not compile silly lists, as does Princeton Review. It is a serious attempt to understand the quality of education that the nation's colleges and universities are providing. Colleges who participate in NSSE do so for a variety of reasons. They may be looking for ways to improve their education, understand their student's perception of their education, or they believe in the goals of the NSSE.
As a student or parent, I suggest you look at the variety of questions asked in the student survey, determine which of those measures are most important to you, and then look at the results to see how institutions of the general type you are interested in are doing according to their students.
Thursday, December 21, 2006
Thursday, December 07, 2006
Why You Shouldn't Apply to Too Many Colleges
I hope that all is well with your applications and that you are now resting a bit. I wanted to share some interesting data I have been collecting. As part of my job, I have been running a survey in which I ask students, among other questions, how many colleges and universities they applied to. This was the topic of an earlier post and at the end of that post, I mentioned I would return to the topic. So here we are.
While the survey is not scientific and only has data from over 40 respondents, the results are interesting. The number of schools that people are applying to vary widely. The extremes were a total of 2 schools applied to on the low end and 16 applied to on the high end. The mean number of schools applied to is 5.875 or 6. The mode is 6, however 5 and 7 applications are the most frequent numbers cited. Again, this is not a scientific survey, it is merely a sampling of students.
What does this mean? Well, it is hard to say with any accuracy. But I have some comments. Firstly, applying to 16 schools is overkill. You can only attend one (1) of those schools. Applying to so many indicates an applicant who has not done their homework. They should be able to easily cut that number down to the average, or 6 in this sample. If you think about it, you should be able to narrow down a list of schools you are interested in to at most 10. From that 10, you should be able to pare it down to as low as four, as high as six. You know realistically what kind of a shot you have at many of these schools. You also know that a number of them are safety schools. You shouldn't need so many safety schools. One is enough. You really have no intention of going to a safety school unless there is some unforeseen catastrophe.
Applying to more schools than is reasonable is a problem for all the concerns we discussed previously. In addition, I would like to make this a bit more personal by saying that when one applies to more than 7 or 8 schools, they are being selfish and lazy. Lazy because, as mentioned above, you didn't do your homework. You are being selfish because you are taking up precious time that admissions reviewers could spend on serious applications. As well, you are taking potential spots of admission from people who really might love to attend a particular school. What if the person who would really love to attend the school you just whimsically sent off an application to is someone you know? What if it is a good friend and because of your meaningless application they were not offered a spot of admission? How would either of those situations make you feel?
I don't mean to be impudent in this post. Rather I hope to be applying a dose of reality to a situation that, by many estimates, has gone out of hand. Admission to college has become increasingly stressful and difficult. I believe one (of many) causes of this is due to the fact that students over-apply to colleges. Talk to your friends and people you know about this. Get their feedback. Maybe I'm making too much out of nothing. Feel free to post a comment. I encourage dialogue.
While the survey is not scientific and only has data from over 40 respondents, the results are interesting. The number of schools that people are applying to vary widely. The extremes were a total of 2 schools applied to on the low end and 16 applied to on the high end. The mean number of schools applied to is 5.875 or 6. The mode is 6, however 5 and 7 applications are the most frequent numbers cited. Again, this is not a scientific survey, it is merely a sampling of students.
What does this mean? Well, it is hard to say with any accuracy. But I have some comments. Firstly, applying to 16 schools is overkill. You can only attend one (1) of those schools. Applying to so many indicates an applicant who has not done their homework. They should be able to easily cut that number down to the average, or 6 in this sample. If you think about it, you should be able to narrow down a list of schools you are interested in to at most 10. From that 10, you should be able to pare it down to as low as four, as high as six. You know realistically what kind of a shot you have at many of these schools. You also know that a number of them are safety schools. You shouldn't need so many safety schools. One is enough. You really have no intention of going to a safety school unless there is some unforeseen catastrophe.
Applying to more schools than is reasonable is a problem for all the concerns we discussed previously. In addition, I would like to make this a bit more personal by saying that when one applies to more than 7 or 8 schools, they are being selfish and lazy. Lazy because, as mentioned above, you didn't do your homework. You are being selfish because you are taking up precious time that admissions reviewers could spend on serious applications. As well, you are taking potential spots of admission from people who really might love to attend a particular school. What if the person who would really love to attend the school you just whimsically sent off an application to is someone you know? What if it is a good friend and because of your meaningless application they were not offered a spot of admission? How would either of those situations make you feel?
I don't mean to be impudent in this post. Rather I hope to be applying a dose of reality to a situation that, by many estimates, has gone out of hand. Admission to college has become increasingly stressful and difficult. I believe one (of many) causes of this is due to the fact that students over-apply to colleges. Talk to your friends and people you know about this. Get their feedback. Maybe I'm making too much out of nothing. Feel free to post a comment. I encourage dialogue.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)